Skip Navigation
Community Development Department City of San Luis Obispo
Community Development

SearchContact UsCity Home


Planning Commission Meeting Update

September 26, 2007                  Wednesday                                7:00 p.m.

CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 

ROLL CALL:      Commissioners Dan Carpenter, Michael Multari, John Ashbaugh,  Diana Gould-Wells, and Vice-Chairperson Charles Stevenson  

Commissioners Christianson and Brodie absent.   

ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA:  Accepted as presented  

MINUTES:  Minutes of September 12, 2007  

Accepted with no changes 

PUBLIC COMMENT:  None  

PUBLIC HEARINGS: 

1.        871 and 879 Islay Street.  GP/R and ER 8-06; Request to amend the general plan map and zoning map from medium-density residential with a Historic overlay zoning (R-2-H) to medium-high density residential (R-3-H); Mike McNamara, applicant. (Tyler Corey) 

Associate Planner Tyler Corey gave the staff presentation recommending approval of the General Plan Amendment and rezone.  The applicant, Mike McNamara, clarified that the purpose for the request was not to take advantage of additional site density, but rather to accommodate a four lot common-interest subdivision.  One person spoke during the public hearing portion of the meeting.  Darren Kraker, 827 Islay, did not support additional development adjacent to his property and had concerns with potential privacy and overlook impacts from the project.  There were no further comments made from the public.   On motion by Commissioner Ashbaugh, seconded by Commissioner Gould-Wells, the Commission voted 5:0 (Commissioner Christianson & Brodie were absent) recommending approval of the project to Council.  

2.        300 Lawrence Drive.  TR, PD and ER 77-07; Request for Vesting Tentative Tract Map and Planned Development zoning creating 10 residential and 2 open space lots, and environmental review; R-1 zoning; Total Development Company, applicant.  (Jaime Hill) 

Associate Planner Jaime Hill gave the staff presentation recommending approval of the Planned Development rezoning and vesting tentative map, and adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Commissioner Multari asked several questions about the Conservation easement on Lots 2-6, which Natural Resource Manager Neil Havlik explained would follow City standards as applied most recently to the Bowden Ranch subdivision. Commissioner Ashbaugh questioned the feasibility of 2:1 replacement of Buckeyes in-kind, and potential interference with the freshwater seep, and Mr. Havlik explained that the final planting plan would include sufficient buffering to protect the seep, lily and needlegrass, and if required plantings exceed the available on-site area, some plantings may occur in other areas as identified in the South Hills Management Plan. Commission Stevenson expressed concern about the noise impacts associated with rock crusher operation on the property. The applicant, Michael Coss, addressed several of the Commissioners concerns, explaining that the on-site crusher would be a small machine that would operate for approximately 3-5 days and that the easement at the Mitchell Drive extension allows for general access currently. 

Several area residents commented on the project: Lisa Myrick, 400 block Lawrence, expressed concern about increases in traffic, as the street is narrow with non-ADA compliant sidewalks. Dan Calden, 2463 Ladera Ct., opposed the extension of Mitchell Street and concern that Lot 10 would effect his property value. Dave Hacker, (no address) Lawrence, felt that the project was much improved, felt there was no public benefit to an entrance gate, that de minimus finding was not appropriate, and that traffic was insufficiently mitigated. Shawn McDab, 2438 Cumbre Ct., was concerned about being advised if hazardous materials were found, light pollution, private views from homes, and safety impacts associated with the proposed trail. Arnold Jonas, 2437 Cumbre Ct., thought that the project was significantly improved but pointed out that it was up to the decision makers to determine if full use of the available density was appropriate. Jeff Lambert, 699 Lawrence, spoke in favor of the project because it is consistent with the General Plan, but stated that the neighborhood should be looking into traffic calming options. Richard Stevens, 309 Lawrence, expressed concern about on-street parking capacity and asked if Meadow Drive was going to be closed. There were no further comments made from the public. Acting Chair Stevenson then provided Jaime Hill and Doug Davidson an opportunity to respond to some of the issues raised by the speakers. In the Commission’s discussion Commissioner Ashbaugh expressed that the neighbors should be notified if pollutants are found and that he felt the design of Lot 10 was greatly improved. Commissioner Stevenson stated that there should be images in the architectural guidelines and that they needed to be provided to property owners. Commission Multari asked for clarification of Council direction No.2, and stated that he was in favor of the public trail and that in addition to being provided architectural guidelines, the future property owners should be given the conditions of approval, mitigation measures, and Landscape & mitigation plan. Commissioner Gould-Wells explained that the APCD notification process regarding pollutants was very successful and expressed that the City should provide off-site signage on Mitchell identifying the public trail. 

On motion by Commissioner Ashbaugh, seconded by Commissioner Multari, the Commission voted 5:0 (Commissioner Christianson & Brodie were absent) recommending approval of the project to Council, addition four conditions of approval: 1)The conditions of approval, architectural guidelines, mitigation measures, and all easements shall be recorded on-title with the individual lots.

2) A rock crushing operation plan shall be provided to and approved by the Community Development Department establishing hours and duration of rock crushing operations prior to the commencement of work.

3) A construction monitoring plan consistent with APCD standards shall be submitted to the Community Development Department and approved by the APCD prior to the issuance of public improvement or construction permits. 

4) Mitigation Measure No. 8 shall be revised to state: The appropriate boundary of the upper open space lot shall be subject to modification by the City Natural Resource Manager, following an in the field inspection, in order to ensure sufficient protection of the spineflower within the upper open space lot. 

COMMENT AND DISCUSSION: 

3.        Staff 

A.     Agenda Forecast 

Deputy Director Davidson discussed the open agenda for the next regularly scheduled agenda (October 10th) and the upcoming special meeting on October 17th on the South Broad Street Corridor Plan.  The Commission decided to hold the regularly scheduled meeting of Ocober 10th as a walking tour of the South Broad Street area in preparation for the October 17th meeting.  Meeting will start at 5:30 at Fire Station #1, the corner of Santa Barbara Street and Broad Street.      

4.        Commission 

The meeting ADJOURNED to the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission scheduled for Wednesday, October 10, 2007 to be a walking tour of the South Broad Street area.  Special Time: 5:30 p.m. Special Place: Fire Station #1, corner of Santa Barbara Street and Broad Street.      

 Department Home | Housing | Documents
  Permits | Fees | FAQs | Advisory Bodies


About the City | Visiting SLO | City Government | Employment
Bids & Proposals | FAQs | Press Room | How are we doing?

©2011 City of San Luis Obispo